WHAT IS AN OPTION ON A FUTURES CONTRACT?
An option on a futures contract is the right—but not the obligation—to buy or sell the underlying futures contract at a predetermined price on or before a given future date.
There are a few important terms that relate to options:
-
Call option: Gives the buyer the right, but not the obligation, for a limited period of time to buy (go long) the underlying futures contract at a predetermined price.
-
Put option: Gives the buyer the right, but not the obligation, for a limited period of time to sell (go short) the underlying futures contract at a predetermined price.
-
Strike or exercise price: The price at which the futures contract underlying an option can be purchased (if a call) or sold (if a put). In the call and put definitions above, this is the predetermined price.
-
Premium: The price paid by the buyer to the seller to purchase an option. This price is arrived at through trading on an exchange market, as with futures.
-
Purchaser or holder: The person who buys a call or a put option and pays the option premium, i.e., the person who establishes a long options position. This is the party with the right, but not the obligation, under the terms of the option.
-
Grantor: The person who sells a call or a put option and receives the option premium, i.e., the person who establishes a short options position. This party is obligated to perform under the terms of the option.
-
Exercise: the exercise of a call gives the option purchaser a long position in the underlying futures con tract at the option’s strike price; the exercise of a put gives the option purchaser a short futures position at the option’s strike price.
-
Assignment: The grantor of an option (the party with the short position) has agreed to be obligated by the Option’s terms should the purchaser or holder (the party with the long position) exercise the option? If the holder exercises, the grantor is said to be assigned, or to receive assignment.
-
Time to expiration: The amount of time from the present until the end (expiration) date specified in the option contract.
-
Expiration date: The last day that an option exists and can be exercised.
-
American option: An option that can he exercised at any time up to and including the expiration date. Almost all options traded on U.S. futures exchanges are American style, as are a large percentage of options on futures traded outside the U.S.
-
European option: An option that can be exercised only at its expiration.
-
Underlying futures: Each option is the right to buy (call option) or sell (put option) a futures contract. Additionally, each option pertains to a specific futures delivery month. For example, the underlying future for a December T-bond call is a December T-bond futures contract, whereas the underlying future for a March T bond call is a March-Bond futures contract. Note, when option expirations do not correspond with futures expirations—e.g., a January ‘T-bond option—the underlying futures contract normally is the next futures contract to expire, e.g., the March T-bond. These latter are termed “serial” options.
Naming Options
There are four terms that comprise the name of an option: the underlying futures contract, the option contract month, the strike price and the option type (call or put). Here are some sample option names:
December crude oil 25 call: the holder has the right to buy 1 December crude oil futures contract at $25.00 per barrel.
November soybean 575 put: the holder has the right to sell 1 November soybean contract at $5.75 per bushel.
September S&P 500 1200 call: the holder has the right to buy 1 September S&P 500 futures contract at 1200.00.
Expirations
In the previous examples, the expiration of the option is not explicitly stated in its name. As indicated above, the month designations in the examples, December, November and September, refer to the delivery month of the underlying futures contract and not the expiration of the option, (This is a notable difference from the nomenclature used for stock options.)
Expiration dates of options on futures are set according to the rules and procedures of the exchange on which they trade, and there is no consistency between exchanges or even for various options on the same exchange. In particular, many options on futures expire well before the delivery month of the underlying futures; for example, a December crude oil option expires in November. On the other hand, a September S&P 500 option expires in mid-September. With serial options, expiration dates are even less evident. For example, a November ‘T-bond option, which has a December T-bond futures as the underlying contract, expires in October. As a result, it is critical to verify both the underlying futures contract and the expiration date of every options contract.
FUTURES VS. OPTIONS
There are three important distinctions between futures and options. First, a futures contract requires both buyers and sellers to fulfill their obligations, regardless of whether doing so is profitable or not. In contrast, the purchaser of an option receives the right, but not the obligation, to buy (a call) or sell (a put) at a specific price on or before a specified date. This means that if it is not profitable to do so, the purchaser of an option will not exercise the option but, instead, will allow it to expire worthless. This ability to abandon an option means that potential losses on purchased options positions are limited to the cost of the options. Second, options have a strike price, a unique “trigger point” at which they acquire value at expiration; futures have no such trigger point. Third, to buy or go long an option, the purchaser must pay the option premium to the option seller or grantor, and the option premium must be taken into account when computing the profit and loss on an option position. There are no payments between longs and shorts when establishing a futures position.
If at the expiration of the put the futures price is lower than the options strike price, position will have a positive value. The break-even price of futures put is the option’s strike price minus its premium. If the futures price is higher than the option’s strike price, the put is worthless at expiration, and the purchaser’s loss equals the option premium.
The same holds true for the short put. At expiration, a short put position has its maximum gain - the original option premium - if the underlying futures price is above the option’s exercise or strike price. While potential profits on a short put position are limited to the option premium, potential losses are virtually unlimited. However, because futures prices can only go to zero, losses are actually limited to the difference between the put’s strike price and zero, minus the premium received for selling the put.
An important concept in option valuation is an option’s worth if it were exercised into a futures contract and that futures contract were immediately offset, i.e., similar futures contract sold to offset the long futures position resulting from an exercised call or bought to offset the short futures position resulting from an exercised put this value is called an option’s intrinsic or exercise value. For a call option it is the difference between the futures price and the strike price—so long as the futures price is higher than the option’s strike price. (Here is no intrinsic value if the futures price is below a call’s strike price.) The definition is the opposite for a put, because puts become profitable when the futures price declines; the Intrinsic value of a put is the differ once between the putt’s strike price and the underlying futures price—so long as the futures price is lower than the option’s strike price. These definitions can he expressed as follows:
Futures Price - Strike Price. Otherwise, a Calf 0ption Intrinsic Value = 0
If the Strike Price > Futures Price, then a Put Option’s Intrinsic Value =
Strike Price - Futures Price. Ostensive, a Put Op Intrinsic Value = 0
The foregoing discussion, including the options payoff diagrams, contained an Implicit assumption that an option’s strike price is equal to the current price of the futures contract at the time the option is bought or sold. That does not have to be the case, in fact, options can be described in one of three ways, based on the relationship between the futures price and the option’s strike price:
-
When the option’s strike price is equal to the futures price, both calls and puts are said to be “at-the-money”
-
When an option has intrinsic value (when the strike price of the call is below the futures price or the strike price of the put is above the futures price), the option is termed “in-the-money.’
-
When an option is neither at-the-money nor in-the money, (when the strike price of the call is above the futures price or the strike price of the put is below the futures price), the option is called “out-of the-money”
The financial press placement of options settlement prices for various strikes and expirations has given risk to the descriptive names for options spreads, i.e., positions that encompass a long and a short call or a long and a short put. In particular, options spreads have come to be known as vertical, horizontal or diagonal based on the alignment of the options in the price tables. For example, a call time spread that involves the purchase of a call and the sale of a call, both with the same strike price but with different expiration, is called a horizontal spread, because the prices of the two calls are found on a horizontal line on the options price table. In contrast, a vertical put spread involves the purchase of a put and the sale of a put, both with the same expiration but with different strikes, where the prices of the spread’s components are found on a vertical line. Not surprisingly, a diagonal spread involves the purchase and sale of two calls (or two puts), with different expirations and strikes, where the prices of the two legs of the spread form a diagonal on the options price table.
Since the mid-1970’s, the theory of option valuation and its applications have evolved in terms of sophistication and accessibility. Although theoretical option-pricing models are quite complicated, excellent software exists to compute theoretical option values and help measure and manage the risk of options positions. As a first step in understanding option valuation it is necessary to understand its inputs and how changes in these inputs affect the expected value of an option.
-
Futures price;
-
Option’s strike price;
-
Time to expiration;
-
Volatility of the futures price.
At expiration, options are worth their intrinsic value, if any; as previously discussed, that value derives from the difference between the price of the underlying futures contract and the option’s strike price. Before expiration, however, options almost always are worth more than their intrinsic value.
This second component of an option’s value is called the option’s time value:
Option Value = Intrinsic Value + Time Value
Options also are described as “wasting assets’ As time passes and an option approaches its expiration, the option’s time value declines to zero so that at expiration the only value left in an option—if any value remains— is its intrinsic value. The time decay (the way the option “wastes” over time) differs among at-the-money, In-the- money and out-of-the-money options. Note that the time value rapidly tapers off to zero, with almost all of the decay in the option’s value taking place during the last few weeks of its lift.
How much are the options on the two different underlying futures worth? The first options are easy to evaluate: if the final settlement price of the futures contract is known to be $100, then the 95 strike call will be worth $5 at expiration. Both the $100 and $105 strike calls, however will not be worth anything, because they will have no intrinsic value at expiration.
Volatility, a measure of that uncertainty, is usually expressed as the standard deviation of futures price outcomes on an annual percentage basis. Volatility is non-directional; It does not refer to bullish or bearish sentiments or to whether prices are rising or falling.
The Option Delta
The previous discussion focused on the value of an option given the value of particular factors that affect its price. The following discussion examines how an option’s price changes as the price of the underlying futures changes. Two observations are critical to under standing how option prices change as futures prices change:
-
Option prices do not move in lockstep with futures prices.
-
Option prices can change even if the underlying futures price does not change, because option values are determined by factors In addition to the futures price.
In effect, the option delta indicates the change in the option value for a given change in the price of the underlying futures. It should be noted that the amount an option price changes when the futures price changes Is different for different levels of futures prices and option strike prices, which is why an option’s delta holds only over a relatively small range of the futures price and then must be recalculated.
An example is useful to illustrate how this works. Assume there are call options on crude oil futures with strikes of $15, $20 and $25 per barrel and that the futures price of a barrel of oil is $20 today, 6o days before expiration of the options, if nothing unusual happens, it is very likely that the $15 strike option will expire In-the- money, that the $25 strike option will expire out-of-the- money and that the $20 strike option could go either way. Since the options exercise into futures contracts, it is natural to treat options that are likely to be exercised as if they already were exercised. Since crude oil generally does not move $5 in 60 days, it maybe assumed that the $15 strike options eventually will be futures con tracts. Thus, as options get more and more in-the-money, they are expected to act more and more as if they were futures, i.e., expectations the payoff of a deep-In-the- money option start to look more and more like the expected payoff of the underlying futures contract. On the other hand, it is unlikely that the $25 strike call will be exercised, so as time passes, it is valued more and more as if it were nearly worthless. The call with the $15 strike has a relatively high delta, while the call with the $25 strike has a relatively low delta.
Another way of looking at an option’s delta is that it it the percentage likelihood that the option will expire in- the-money. The $20 strike call has a 50-50 chance of expiring in-the-money and thus has a .5 delta. On the other hand, the $15 strike crude oil option may have a 99 delta because it has close to a 100 percent chance of expiring in-the-money. In contrast, near expiration the $25 strike call may have almost no chance of expiring in-the-money and have a delta near zero.
-
Both puts and calls have deltas. Because puts increase in value when the futures price declines, the delta for a long put is always negative, ranging from 0 to -1, to., the put option price moves in the opposite direction to the price of the underlying futures contract. In contrast, the delta for a short put, which increases in value as the futures price rises, ranges from 0 to +1, the same as the delta for a long call position, that also increases in value as the futures price rises. (Correspondingly, the delta of a short call position ranges between 0 to -1.)
-
Deltas are the same for changes in the futures price up or down. For example, if a (long) call’s delta is .5 and the futures fill 10 basis points, the call price can be expected to fall by about 5 basis points.
-
Deltas vary; in a non-linear fashion, with changing levels of futures prices. As an option goes from being out-of-the-money to in-the-money, the absolute value of its delta increases.
-
All other things equal, an increase in volatility will tend to push an option’s delta towards .50.This is because when volatility increases, all the strikes tend to look more and more like an at-the-money option. This point, however, is sensitive to the length of time remaining before an option’s expiration, as discussed below.
-
Just before expiration, deltas tend to move towards either 0 or 1 (or -1); that is, they get extremely in- or out-of-the-money, because at expiration the option has to be either in- or out-of-the-money. As a result, just before expiration an at-the-money option’s delta will swing between 0 and I (or -1) as the option goes from out-of-the-money to in-the-money and hack again with fluctuating futures prices.
-
The counterpoint to this is that, all other things equal, the more time an option has In Its life, the more it looks like an at-the-money option. This is because the more time remaining, the less certainty about whether the option will expire with Intrinsic value, thereby driving the delta towards 5 or 50 per cent and, hence, making it look more like an at-the- money option.
-
Deltas are approximate numbers based on theoretical expectations about an option’s value; actual option prices often do not move exactly as predicted by an option’s delta, Figure 6.13 lists hypothetical deltas for (long) Eurodollar call options with the futures price at 91.50 and with various lengths of time remaining until expiration. Notice the symmetry in the table. Put deltas have a similar distribution (with negative Instead of positive deltas, as measured from the long side of the market) if the strike prices across the top were reversed in order.
A careful review of an option’s payoff plot indicates that part of the plot—the part with intrinsic value—looks like the payoff diagram of a futures position, while the other part does not. When the long call is in-the-money, its payoff looks like the long futures’ payoff; when the long put is in-the-money, its payoff looks like the short futures’ payoff. This suggests that there are combinations of long and short options that exactly replicate the payoff of a futures position.
Recall that a long futures position gains in value when die underlying futures goes up and decreases in value when the underlying futures goes down. In terms of the options payoff plots, a long call gains on the upside just as a long futures contract, while a short put loses on die downside just as a long futures position does. Thus, a long call and a short put in combination give the same payoff as does a long futures contract. This is called a “synthetic” long futures position. A synthetic short futures position can be created in a like manner. A short futures position gains when the underlying futures goes down, and It loses when the underlying futures goes up. The combination of a long put (which gains when the futures goes down) and a short call (which loses when the futures goes up) replicates a short futures position.
Long Futures = Long Call + Short Put
Short Futures = Short Call + Long Put
Long Call = Long Futures + Long Put
Short Call = Short Futures + Short Put
Long Put = Short Futures + Long Call
Short Put = Long Futures + Short Call
In the construction of synthetics, the calls and puts must have the same strike prices, and the futures and both options must expire at the same time. Further, the premium for the purchased option should approximate that of the granted option, thereby rendering the synthetic position virtually costless to initiate, as is the case with a futures contract.
One reason synthetics are important is that the ability to replicate futures or options positions allows traders to buy the cheaper position and sell the more expensive. For instance, assume that the call is relatively over priced with respect to the long future/long put position. If a market participant needed a long call, he or she could trade the synthetic position instead of the actual position. Alternate; exchange market-makers seeing a relatively overpriced call would sell it and purchase the synthetic call by buying the futures and the put. Market-makers call this synthetic position a conversion. A reversal or reverse conversion is the combination of a short futures position and the purchase of the synthetic futures—buying the call and selling the put. The fact that the payoffs of futures and options can be replicated through these synthetic relationships forces prices of options and futures into line with one another via arbitrage. Ti means that options and futures should always he priced efficiently. The appendix to this chapter introduces the concept of Put-Call Parity, the mathematical expression of these synthetic relationships.
Offset
Before expiration, options on futures are traded— bought and sold—in the exchange market where, as is the case with futures, existing positions can be offset. For example, a long March 375 wheat put can be offset by the sale of a March 375 wheat put. Note that puts can only be offset with an equal and opposite transaction in puts, t an open put position cannot be offset with a call position. Also note that an offsetting option position, besides belonging to the same option class (I. c call or put on the same underlying futures contract) must also belong to the same option series (tie., same expiration date and same strike price). When an option Is offset It is possible to realize both time and intrinsic value. When an option is exercised, only intrinsic value is received.
Exercise
The purchaser of either a call or a put has a long option position that can be exercised into a futures position. Upon exercise by a purchaser, a corresponding short is said to be assigned. The exercise of a long call results in the receipt of a long futures position at the strike price of the call plus an immediate marking to market of the difference between the current futures price and the option’s strike price (so long as the call has Intrinsic value). When a long call is exercised, the holder of a short call in the same option series (i.e., a call with the same strike price and expiration date on the same underlying futures contract) is assigned a short futures position, and that position also is marked to market. The exercise of a long put results In the receipt of a short futures position at the put’s strike price plus an immediate marking to market of the difference between the put’s strike price and the current futures price (so long as the put has intrinsic value). Similarly, the holder of a short put position is assigned a long futures position at the option’s strike price, and that position is marked to the market immediately.
-
Because the most that can be obtained in exercising an option is the option’s intrinsic value, it makes economic sense to exercise only In-the-money options with little or no time value.
As previously discussed, an American-style option can be exercised on any business day the option is traded, including the day it is purchased, up to and including the expiration date of the option. -
For options expiring on the same day as an underlying cash-settled futures contract, exercise on the last trading day results in a cash settlement of the option position, because the underlying futures contract terminates trading at the same time.
-
The clearinghouse establishes an unbiased procedure for assigning exercised short option positions, such as random assignment of exercise notices to clearing member firms or assignment of the oldest position held by any clearing firm. The clearing firm then assigns the exercise notices to its clients by an approved selection process.
-
Notice of assignment is given to the clearing member before trading begins on the day following an exercise notice.
-
Many option contracts provide for automatic exercise of in-the-money options at expiration.
-
When there is no automatic exercise, the buyer’s clearing firm must present an exercise notice to the exchange’s clearinghouse by the designated time for that contract on the exercise day.
Market Order
A distributor is long a March futures call option on 42,000 gallons of gasoline with an exercise price of 60 cents per gallon, and the current futures price of gasoline for delivery in March is 64 cents. If the option is exercised, the distributor receives $1,680 (42,000 gallons/contract x 4 cents/gallon) from marking the option to market plus a long gasoline futures position in the March contract, if desired, the futures position can be immediately closed out.
The option that the long exercises Is exercised “against” the option grantor, who is short the option. In the first example above, the grantor of the gasoline call would receive a short gasoline futures position at the option’s strike price (60 cents/gallon), and that position would be marked to market immedlatel¾ with the option grantor’s loss of $1,680 passing to the option purchaser. In the second case, the option grantor would receive a long soybean oil futures position In the August contract at the 20 cents/pound exercise price, and that position would be marked to market immediately, leading to a $900 payment from the option grantor that the clearing house would pass through to the option purchaser.
